Improving Quality of Life through Recreational Behaviour in Urban Park
Main Article Content
Abstract
Well-designed of an urban park is one of the best ways to achieve the city sustainable development and contributes to the quality of life in many ways. Central to this argument is the claim that the variables need to be considered and thus, this research was conducted to assess the quality of urban park by empirically evaluating through behavioral competencies and psychological well-being from the model of Lawton’s Quality of Life. A quantitative research method was employed for the research with 134 respondents in Taman Lembah Bukit SUK, Shah Alam. Results confirm that the urban park provides the potential for psychological well-being and behavioral competencies equally among male and female in improving their quality of life.
Metrics
Article Details
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Nurul Shakila Khalid, Nurul Faizah Baba, Hazlina Hamdan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abdul Malek, N., Mariapan, M., Kamal, M., & Shariff. (2011). Assessing the Needs for Quality Neighbourhood Parks. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(10), 743–753.
Abdul Malek, N., Mariapan, M., & Ab Rahman, N. I. A. (2015). Community Participation in Quality Assessment for Green Open Spaces in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 168, 219-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.227
Dergance, J. M., Calmbach, W. L., Dhanda, R., Miles, T. P., Hazuda, H. P., & Mouton, C. P. (2003). Barriers to and Benefits of Leisure Time Physical Activity in the Elderly: Differences Across Cultures. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51(6), 863-868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51271.x
Guidelines and Planning Standard for Open Space and Recreation (2000). Department of Town and Country Planning, Peninsular Malaysia.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S., (1989). Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Lawton, M. P. (1991). A Multidimensional View of Quality of Life in Frail Elders. In James, E. et al., (ed), The Concept and Measurement of Quality of Life in the Frail Elderly. Psychology, 3-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-101275-5.50005-3
Lu, L. (2011). Leisure and Depression in Midlife: A Taiwanese National Survey of Middle-aged Adults. Journal of Health Psychology, 16(1), 137-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105310370501
Omar, K. A., Omar, D., Othman, S., & Yusoff, Z. M. (2017). Youth in Public Housing: Place attachment and Quality of Life Index. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 2(5), 325-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v2i5.704
Omar, D., Ibrahim, F. I., & Mohamad, N. H. N. (2016). Evaluating Multi-dimensional Human Needs in Open Spaces: Taman Tasik Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 1(2), 96-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v1i2.259
Omar, D., & Ibrahim, F. I. (2015). Human Interaction in Open Spaces. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 352-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.186
Sajin, N. B., Dahlan, A., & Ibrahim, S. A. S. (2016). Quality of Life and Leisure Participation amongst Malay Older People in the Institution. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 234, 83-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.222
Teal, M., Huang, C. S., & Rodiek, J. (1998). Open Space Planning for Travis Country, Austin, Texas: A Collaborative Design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42(2), 259-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00091-7
Ulrich, R. S., & Addoms, D. L., (1981). Psychological and Recreational Benefits of a Residential Park. Journal of Leisure Research, 13(1), 43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1981.11969466