Efficacy and Decisional Balance to Intervene
Main Article Content
Abstract
Previous studies have shown the rate of domestic violence towards women in Indonesia is increasing. Researches in the field have found that one of the most effective ways to prevent the violence was the bystander. To understand the characteristics of bystander in the sample of teenager in Indonesia, this study seeks to determine the relationship between efficacy and Decisional Balance and likelihood to intervene. The result showed that there is a significant correlation between bystander efficacy and tendency to intervene, yet no empirical support for Decisional Balance.
Metrics
Article Details
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Tommy Prayoga, Amanda Giovani Pea, Yosef Dedy Pradipto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Aisyah, S. & Parker, L. (2014). Problematic conjugations: Women’s agency, marriage and domestic violence in Indonesia. Asian Studies Review, 38(2), 205-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2014.899312
Banyard, V. L. (2008). Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 23(1), 83-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.83
Banyard, V. L., Eckstein, R. P. & Moynihan, M. M. (2010). Sexual Violence Prevention The Role of Stages of Change. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(1), 111-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508329123
Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M. & Plante, E. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20159
Barna, I. & Barna, O. (2014). The Effectiveness of School-based Violence Prevention Programs for Reducing Aggressive Behaviour. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 137, 88-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.257
Darley, J. M. & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. Journal of personality and social psychology, 8(4p1), 377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589
Golu, F. (2014). Predictors of Domestic Violence–Comparative Analysis.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 611-615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.321
Hayati, E. N., Eriksson, M., Hakimi, M., Högberg, U. & Emmelin, M. (2013). ‘Elastic band strategy’: women's lived experiences of coping with domestic violence in rural Indonesia. Global Health Action, 6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.18894
Hartono, B. (2014). Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan Pelapor Selaku Saksi Korban Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga. KEADILAN PROGRESIF, 5(1).
Koon, J. A. (2013). Masculinity and bystander helping behavior: a study of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and bystander interventions.
LaBrie, J. W., Pedersen, E. R., Thompson, A. D. & Earleywine, M. (2008). A brief Decisional Balance intervention increases motivation and behavior regarding condom use in high-risk heterosexual college men. Archives of sexual behavior, 37(2), 330-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9195-y
Ramakrishnan, M. S. (2014). Speak Out: Teaching Domestic Violence in Your Literature Classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 296-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.040
Rose, S. D. (2013). Challenging global gender violence. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 61-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.225
Safta, C. G., Stan, E., Iurea, C. & Suditu, M. (2010). Counseling and Assistance for Women Victims of Domestic Violence in Romania-Case Study.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2034-2041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.409
Siyez, D. M. & Kaya, A. (2010). The influence of some psychological problems and socio-demographic variables upon attitudes toward violence in adolescence. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 334-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.100