The Execution of Key Performance Indicators in the Operational Phase of PFI Projects in Malaysia

  • Nor Suzila Lop Centre of Postgraduate Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Seri Iskandar Campus, Seri Iskandar, 32610, Perak, Malaysia.
  • Kharizam Ismail Faculty of Architecture Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Seri Iskandar Campus, Seri Iskandar, 32610, Perak, Malaysia.
  • Haryati Mohd Isa Faculty of Architecture Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Seri Iskandar Campus, Seri Iskandar, 32610, Perak, Malaysia.
Keywords: Challenges, Importance, Key Performance Indicators, Private Finance Initiative.

Abstract

In Private Finance Initiative (PFI), payment for services is based on pre-determined standards and performance. Thus, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) have been used to measure this performance. However, lack of an effective KPIs was identified as a core criticism towards the execution of PFI projects. Therefore, the objectives of the research are to determine the importance and challenges of KPIs in measuring this performance. A qualitative approach via semi-structured interview was adopted. The findings discovered that the current KPIs do not meet the criteria and this can lead to the difficulties in measuring the performance of PFI projects. The outcome of this research can serve as a theoretical base for the development of an effective KPIs for PFI projects implementation in Malaysia.

Keywords: Challenges; Importance; Key Performance Indicators; Private Finance Initiative.

eISSN 2398-4279 © 2018. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. 

References

Akbıyıklı, R. (2013). Performance Assessment of A Private Finance Initiative Road Project. Transport, 28(February 2015), 11–24.

Akintoye, A., Beck, M., Hardcastle, C., Chinyio, E And Asenova, D (2001). Standardised Framework For Risk Assessment and Management of Private Finance Initiative Projects, Report No. 5 Department Of Building And Surveying. Glasgow Caledonian University.

Centre For Construction Innovation For Constructing Excellence In The North West (2006). KPI Gives An Interior/Exterior View of Business. Manchester: Centre For Construction Innovation.

Cox, R. F., Issa, R. R. A., & Ahrens, D. (2003). Management’s Perception of Key Performance Indicators For Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering And Management, 129(2), 142–151.

David, & Steve. (2012). The Top Ten Risks That Auditors Should Be Aware of When Reviewing The Operational Phase of PFI Schemes. HM Treasury.

Hodge, G. A. (2004). The Risky Business Of Public – Private Partnerships. Symposium, 63(December), 37–49.

House Of Commons. (2003). The Operational Performance Of PFI Prisons: Forty-Ninth Report Of Session 2002-2003, (December).

Isa, H. M., Ismail, K., Zainol, H., & Othman, M. F. (2016). Tracking Architectural Defects In University Building In Malaysia. MATEC Web Of Conferences, 66 (00017), 2–7.

Ismail, K. (2012). A Value For Money Assessment Framework For Public Private Partnership Approach, A Phd, Thesis. Malaysia.

Ismail, S. (2009). Key Performance Indicator For Private Finance Initiative In Malaysia, A Phd, Thesis. Malaysia.

Javed, A. A., Lam, P. T. I., & Chan, A. P. C. (2013a). A Model Framework Of Output Specifications For Hospital PPP/PFI Projects. Journal Of Facilities Management, 31(13), 610–633.

Javed, A. A., Lam, P. T. I., & Zou, P. X. W. (2013b). Output-Based Specifications For PPP Projects: Lessons For Facilities Management From Australia. Journal Of Facilities Management, 11(1), 5–30.

Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R., & Aouad, G. (2001). Performance Management In Construction: A Conceptual Framework. Journal Of Construction Management & Economics, 19(1), 85–95.

Khaderi, S. S., & Aziz, A. R. A. (2010). Adoption Of Private Finance Initiative (PFI) In Malaysian Public Works Projects: Are We Ready ? CIB TG72 World Building Congress, 105–120.

Lawther, W. C., & Martin, L. (2014). Availability Payments And Key Performance Indicators: Challenges For Effective Implementation Of Performance Management Systems In Transportation Public-Private Partnerships. Public Works Management & Policy, 19(5), 219–234.

Liu, J., Love, P. E. D. D., Smith, J., Regan, M., & Palaneeswaran, E. (2015). Review Of Performance Measurement: Implications For Public–Private Partnerships. Built Environment Project And Asset Management, 5(1), 35–51.

Liu, J., Love, P. E. D., Davis, P. R., Smith, J., & Regan, M. (2013). Performance Measurement Framework In PPP Projects.

Mladenovic, G., Vajdic, N., Wündsch, B., & Temeljotov-Salaj, A. (2013). Use Of Key Performance Indicators For PPP Transport Projects To Meet Stakeholders’ Performance Objectives. Built Environment Project And Asset Management, 3(2), 228–249.

Molenaar, K., Garvin, M., Proctor, G., & Navarro, D. (2011). Key Performance Indicators In Public-Private Partnerships, (March), 120.

NAO. (2003). The Operational Performance Of PFI Prisons, (June), 55.

NAO. (2010). The Performance And Management of Hospital PFI Contracts, 68.

Oyedele, L. O. (2013). Avoiding Performance Failure Payment Deductions In PFI/PPP Projects: A Model Of Critical Success Factors. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, (June), 259.

Regan, M., Smith, J., & Love, P. E. D. (2011). The Impact of The Capital Market Collapse on Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects. Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 137(1), 6–16.

Robinson, H. S. H., & Scott, J. (2009). Service Delivery And Performance Monitoring In PFI/PPP Projects. Construction Management and Economics, 27(2), 181–197.

Rusmani, N. (2010). Public Private Partnership in New Zealand and Malaysia.

Sarantakos, S (2012). Social Research (4th Edition). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Shahin, A., & Mahbod, M. A. (2007). Prioritization of Key Performance Indicators. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(3), 226–240.

Takim, R., R, A. R., Ismail, K., & C.O, E. (2008). The Acceptability of Private Finance Initiative (PFI) Scheme in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 4(12), 71–82.

Toor, S.-R., & Ogunlana, S. O. (2010). Beyond The “Iron Triangle”: Stakeholder Perception of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) For Large-Scale Public Sector Development Projects. International Journal Of Project Management, 28(3), 228–236.

Universiti Teknologi MARA (2015). Laporan Audit Fasiliti & Perkhidmatan. Perak. Universiti Teknologi Mara, Cawangan Perak.

Universiti Teknologi MARA (2016). Laporan Prestasi Konsesi. Selangor. Bahagian Dasar Operasi PFI, Pejabat Pembangunan Infrastruktur.

VAGO. (2002). Report Of The Auditor-General on The Finances of The State of Victoria, 2001-2002.

Yescombe, E. R. (2008). The Social Sector : PFI Schools Projects In The U. K ., (November), 1–18.

Yong, H. K. (2010). Public-Private Partnerships Policy and Practice, London: C. Secretariat.

Yuan, J., Zeng, A. Y., Skibniewski, M. J., & Li, Q. (2009). Selection of Performance Objectives and Key Performance Indicators in Public–Private Partnership Projects to Achieve Value for Money. Construction Management and Economics, 27(3), 253–270.

Published
2018-07-20
Section
Articles